UK FSA fines approach £100 million
How effective are the FSA’s efforts to deter market abuse?
LONDON – Fines administered by the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) since its creation in 2001 are approaching the £100 million mark. The regulator is particularly focusing on market abuse and Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) failings, and both of these areas have seen high-profile fines in the past year.
Almost 40% of this year’s £20.5 million in fines were levied against Santander-owned UK bank Alliance & Leicester (A&L). A&L and HFC Bank, part of HSBC, were jointly fined £8.1 million for mis-selling payment protection insurance – a key focus of the FSA’s TCF regime.
A number of cases in 2008 have related to market abuse, but most of these fines concern events that occurred several years ago. High-profile market abuse allegations relating to share prices in UK bank HBOS prompted an FSA investigation, but no charges were brought.
Selwyn Blair-Ford, a senior domain expert for UK regulation at FRSGlobal, says: “For the UK financial market as a whole, we can applaud where the regulator successfully challenges and reprimands undesirable behaviour. However, the fines do not appear to really address the issues of insider trading or market manipulation. We need to have a plea bargaining arrangement, where the guilty can mitigate punishment by blowing the whistle on others, to further address these issues.”
September’s ban against short selling of shares in several UK banks – still in operation – is another FSA move to stymie suspected market abuse. Despite political talk of ‘spivs in suits’, this action is not aimed at individual abusers but rather at a long-established form of speculation within the financial system.
“Action should not have been taken unilaterally against short selling, but instead against those individuals spreading rumours to drive the price of stocks down. In short, don't penalise short sellers but instead arrest or fine the market manipulators,” says Blair-Ford.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Most read
- SG trader dismissals shine spotlight on intraday limit controls
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one