McCreevy: How to get the best from Sepa
Charlie McCreevy says the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa) is a “tremendous opportunity” for Europe
DUBLIN – “How we can make the best of Sepa?” That was the question asked by European Union commissioner for the internal market and services, Charlie McCreevy, on Friday. McCreevy was addressing the Irish National Payments Conference on the subject of the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa).
“Sepa is a tremendous opportunity for Europe and countries like Ireland, but it remains one of the best kept secrets in the single market,” said McCreevy.
“A recent study carried out by Capgemini for the Commission estimates that if we can migrate quickly to Sepa, the potential benefits in payments markets alone are €123 billion over the next six years.
“But this is not the end of the story, if we can use Sepa as a platform for e-invoicing, then the study estimates that a further €238 billion of savings could be achieved. In addition, Sepa could be used as a platform for e-lending and trade financing. In the public sector, Sepa could be used to drive e-government and the development of transactional services in areas such as e-procurement, taxation, and customs,” said McCreevy.
McCreevy went on to outline a number of “next steps” necessary to realise Sepa’s benefits for the European market, including the importance of members quickly implementing the Payments Services Directive (PSD).
“There are many exciting developments taking place in payments markets, such as mobile payments, pre-paid cards, contactless cards and e-invoicing. Our hope is that the PSD will foster market innovation by providing a prudential framework facilitating the access of new players into payments markets,” said McCreevy.
The commissioner then outlined what the market has so far achieved. McCreevy highlighted the 4,000 banks already on board Sepa’s credit-transfer scheme and the hundreds of thousands of daily Sepa transfers, before outlining – as he sees it – what the market still needs to do by 2010.
“We need to avoid a long migration period as this is particularly costly for the banking industry. The longer the transition period, the longer banks have to bear duplicate costs for operating existing legacy payment systems as well as the new Sepa systems. This will result in sub-optimal Sepa pricing.”
The commissioner spoke of the role public authorities can play as catalysts for Sepa’s adoption, citing their 15-20% share of all payments made and the wider consumer benefits. He also conceded the necessity for a balanced cost-benefit approach to Sepa migration.
“We are not arguing that public authorities should blindly adopt Sepa products whatever the cost. On the contrary, early adoption of the new Sepa payment instruments must be subject to respect of the non-deterioration principle as compared to the cost and service level of existing payment instruments. We fully support the non-deterioration principle. Therefore, banks should in the first place develop attractive products and market them actively so that there is a natural momentum for customers to migrate to Sepa,” said McCreevy.
The commissioner also spoke about the European Commission’s ruling against MasterCard’s multilateral interchange fee (MIF), the desire for standardisation in Europe and recent reports of European banks’ correspondence with the EC over the creation of a European alternative to the Visa-MasterCard duopoly.
“Of course, as regards the possible emergence of a genuine European scheme, I fully recognise that where banks are called upon to make fresh investment to create a new EU debit card player, clarity on possible business models and a possible MIF that is compatible with EU competition law is crucial.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
Most read
- Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
- For a growing number of banks, synthetics are the real deal
- Did Fed’s stress capital buffer blunt CCAR?