IIF report shows banks making changes to pay structures
The banking industry is acting together to assure regulators it recognises the need for reform of compensation structures to be more long-term, risk-based
Washington DC - Financial services firms are moving forward with far-reaching changes in their approaches to employee compensation, according to a new report from the Institute of International Finance (IIF).
Firms are proceeding with reforms that are both in line with the principles published by the IIF in July 2008 and by the Financial Stability Forum that said its principles "aim to ensure effective governance of compensation, alignment of compensation with prudent risk taking, and effective supervisory oversight and stakeholder engagement in compensation".
Josef Ackermann, chairman of the IIF board of directors, chairman of the management board and the group executive committee of Deutsche Bank, said: "The message today is that progress is being made in reforming compensation in firms across our industry. The leading edge of these efforts reflects the first of the IIF's principles, which stresses that compensation incentives should be based on actual performance and should be aligned with shareholder interests and long-term, firm-wide profitability, taking into account overall risk and the cost of capital."
Last summer the IIF published a comprehensive report highlighting needed industry reforms in a range of areas including compensation (Final Report of the IIF Committee on Market Best Practices). On Monday, March 30, the IIF released a report on compensation practices carried out by consultancy firm Oliver Wyman comprised of a survey of financial services firms, which includes corporate and institutional banking sectors, and interviews with senior industry executives at a range of firms. The report found wide agreement that compensation incentives should not induce risk-taking in excess of the firm's own risk appetite, and significant support for the view that compensation should include a component reflecting the firm's overall results in line with sound risk management and business goals.
Ackermann said: "The industry broadly recognises that compensation structures in the past had shortcomings. It is necessary for firms to put in place practices that are more appropriately aligned to the current and prospective needs of our industry and to the exigencies of market stability. The IIF's principles are unique in their global emphasis and scope, and have been endorsed by senior executives from major firms from a large number of countries. They established benchmarks for the industry, and we are pleased to note the recent announcements of principles for compensation by key regulatory and supervisory bodies that are broadly consistent with those of the IIF."
Klaus-Peter Mueller, chairman of the supervisory board, Commerzbank, and co-chairman of the steering committee said: "The majority of firms surveyed are moving towards full alignment with the seven principles set out by the IIF Committee on Market Best Practices in its 2008 report, and they are doing so on an urgent basis. The consensus around the direction of change in industry compensation practices is unprecedented, and provides a solid basis for the initiatives underway in the financial services industry."
The IIF said a lot of work still remains to be done to fully reform compensation structures, but it noted that this report showed a number of firms have already developed systematic approaches towards reflecting risk in performance measurement, handling deferred compensation mechanisms and establishing sound governance standards for the overall compensation process.
As the process of reform moves forward throughout the industry, the problem of "first-mover disadvantage", or the risk that the first firms to introduce new compensation schemes will lose talent, is diminished.
Click here for the survey.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Most read
- SG trader dismissals shine spotlight on intraday limit controls
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one