Negative Eonia splits US and EU banks, traders and lawyers
Collateral posters should pay when rates are negative, US banks believe; their European peers are listening to lawyers who say it's not clear cut
During September and October, as Eonia dipped in and out of negative territory, there was a marked difference of tone when talking to US and European banks about whether a poster of euro cash collateral would have to pay rather than receive interest.
As a rule, the US banks assumed lofty, statesmanlike airs, calling on the industry to recognise the importance of the principle at stake – that negative rates are negative rates, and if clearing houses expect a collateral poster to pay interest in those circumstances, so should everyone else.
The European banks were more like school kids who had just managed to stub out and dispose of their cigarettes before the principal walked around the corner. There was a fair amount of smirking and a studied innocence. They were often quite interested in the legal niceties.
It was easy to imagine the conversations between US collateral receivers and European posters during those weeks.
US bank: "We have €3 billion of your collateral. You'll have noticed Eonia is negative. We assume you'll be paying up."
The US banks assumed lofty, statesmanlike airs, calling on the industry to recognise the importance of the principle that was at stake
European bank: "Well, ordinarily, we'd be delighted, but I've just spent two hours talking to our lawyers and they say it's not clear there's an obligation to do so. We're trying to get a definitive answer, of course, but for now we've been instructed not to pay. Yes, yes, I know – I'm as frustrated as you."
Something like that, anyhow.
The divide can be seen in the list of signatories to the negative rates protocol, published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association in May, which clarifies there is no floor on the interest payable – Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley are all on board, but no big European dealers have so far joined them. As of October 29, Danske Bank and ING were the only major European banks to have signed.
Despite all of this, the size of the payments that would be required are small, perhaps running into the hundreds of thousands of euros and possibly touching the millions if Eonia remains negative for any length of time.
When pressed, traders on both sides of the Atlantic hold the same view: if the reference rate is negative, a collateral poster should pay. But lawyers insist the contract does not make that clear, so in the near term it should come as no surprise to see some banks using that defence.
In the longer term, the industry may well get its act together and sign the protocol en masse. But if that happens, I wager it will not be until Eonia is firmly back in positive territory.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Markets
The squeezing middle: data shows Europeans taking on US foes
Dealer Rankings 2024: Barclays, BNP Paribas and Deutsche grab bigger share of the pie
Cuts and points – how the Dealer Rankings work
Dealer Rankings 2024: We have a simple way to compare dealers. Sort of simple, anyway
T+1 shift sparks dividend chaos in HK structured products
Products staying on T+2 leave providers scrambling to deal with ex-dividend dates caught inbetween
FX futures momentum challenges primary venues’ pricing role
Panellists suggest spot FX primary markets’ importance in models has “diminished”
Citi tops second edition of Risk’s Dealer Rankings
Dealer Rankings 2024: Data shows five big US dealers still lead, but with Europeans closing in
OCC introduces new intraday risk charge covering zero-day options
Revised measures “a nightmare” to implement, says one broker-dealer
Cecilia Skingsley on monetary policy tech and a unified ledger
BIS Innovation Hub head discusses tokenisation, CBDCs and AI’s ‘black box problem’
Korea FX reforms expected to drive e-trading surge
Dealers say opening onshore FX market to foreign firms will push trading onto platforms
Most read
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one
- New FICC clearing model still holds fears for buy side
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets