JP Morgan only bank set to benefit from Fed’s G-Sib review
Proposal to reduce ‘cliff effects’ would generate 10bp surcharge relief while four peers face higher requirements
JP Morgan would be the only global systemically important bank (G-Sib) to benefit from a proposed rule change from the US Federal Reserve to increase the sensitivity of the G-Sib surcharge framework, Risk Quantum has found.
Under the current framework, known as Method 2, the US G-Sib surcharge is calculated in 50-basis point increments, the same sensitivity as prescribed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s assessment methodology, known as Method 1. The Fed’s proposal, released on
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk Quantum
Guangfa’s NSFR drops to just above regulatory minimum
Eight of 12 Chinese banks see decline in funding metric in Q1
Six Chinese banks set market risk records in Q1
Market RWAs spike 63% overall in first disclosures after rules update
NYCB doubles down on borrowing as deposits keep ebbing
Wholesale funding made up a third of the bank’s interest expense in Q1
Republic First’s securities portfolio lost over $100m in 2024
Fair-value losses on non-agency RMBS holdings accelerated as rate cut expectations dimmed
End of BTFP curtails Comerica’s contingent funding pool
Decision not to take avail of facility’s paper-loss amnesty showcases US regional banks’ conundrum
False start: 13 EU banks miscalculate new GAR coverage metric
Unclear instructions, late guidance and poor font choices among reasons behind diverging interpretations from EBA’s template
Op risk hits all-time highs at three Nordic banks
Regular updates drive record rises at Handelsbanken, Nordea and SEB
One-tenth of US banks exceed CRE concentration thresholds
US supervisors face operational challenge with constellation of 536 lenders above risk benchmarks at end-2023
Most read
- Podcast: Olivier Daviaud on P&L attribution for options
- SG trader dismissals shine spotlight on intraday limit controls
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one