Police question second SG employee
A new lead has emerged in the recent case of unauthorised trading at Société Générale (SG), which cost the bank €4.9 billion in January.
When news of the scandal broke in January, SG attributed the losses to unauthorised positions totalling €49 billion taken by a single person: Jérôme Kerviel, a junior arbitrage trader on its delta one equity derivatives desk.
Reports from Paris suggest the latest person brought in for questioning – believed to be a broker in the bank’s equity trading group - is not Moussa Bakir, a broker at SG subsidiary Fimat (renamed Newedge in January) who was questioned in February and named a material witness in the case. The broker was later released without charge.
Also on Wednesday, New York law firm Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll filed a class action lawsuit against SG. The claim was made on behalf of all investors who purchased the bank’s American depository receipts and US buyers of SG shares on overseas exchanges between August 1, 2005 and January 23, 2008.
The complaint – filed in the New York federal court – alleges SG made false statements regarding its subprime mortgage exposures and the strength of its internal controls, suggesting in particular the bank failed to act on several alerts that could have uncovered Kerviel’s trading activities sooner.
“It is apparent SG did in fact authorise a culture of risk to flourish, with the resulting detrimental impact to its shareholders,” said Steven Toll, managing partner at Cohen Milstein. “The enormous loss in the subprime market and the dramatic loss of $7 billion in the trading department were completely unexpected to those investing in SG securities.”
See also: Genius or blunder?
Back-office savvy aided SG fraud
SG losses likely to affect structured products business
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB start dates must align globally, says European Commission
Lawmaker could trigger delay to market risk rules in Europe if US implementation drags on
Fed green lights more capital relief trades
Five US banks authorised to issue repeat credit-linked notes backed by financial guarantees
Basel III endgame: why moving fast might prove better for banks
Republicans are pushing for reproposal, but a rapid finalisation may prove less far-reaching
Isda pushes to ‘decouple’ Simm calibration from model changes
Emir 3.0 prompts effort to separate risk-weight revisions from methodology updates
Basel war on window-dressing may smooth liquidity, at a price
Changes to G-Sib charge could curb year-end repo volatility, but also cut balance sheet capacity
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Most read
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one
- FRTB start dates must align globally, says European Commission
- Basel triggers new tussle on anti-Archegos rules