Investors sue HSBC, BNY Mellon and Lehman over 'Minibonds'
HONG KONG & NEW YORK - A group of Hong Kong investors that bought 'minibonds' linked to Lehman Brothers has filed a class-action lawsuit against Bank of New York Mellon, HSBC and bankruptcy-filed Lehman Brothers. Investors allege the minibonds were sold as safe bonds but were in fact backed by now largely worthless collateralised debt obligations and credit default swaps. They allege Bank of New York Mellon and HSBC failed to protect the 34,000 Hong Kong buyers of the complex derivative instruments linked to the failed US investment bank.
The lawsuit is trying to claw back the $1.6 billion held in collateral by HSBC and BNY Mellon to be released to investors. The investors claim HSBC is the issuer, trustee and custodian of the minibonds and BNY Mellon is custodian of some assets held within the structured products whose value has been slashed since Lehman's collapse. HSBC says it was trustee but not issuer of the minibonds and did not know whether it was custodian.
It is understood that 34,000 Hong Kong investors bought $1.79 billion of minibonds from 23 local banks and brokers. A special committee of Hong Kong's legislative council and the jurisdiction's Securities and Futures Commission are investigating allegations of mis-selling.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB start dates must align globally, says EC
Lawmaker could trigger delay to market risk rules in Europe if US implementation drags on
Fed green lights more capital relief trades
Five US banks authorised to issue repeat credit-linked notes backed by financial guarantees
Basel III endgame: why moving fast might prove better for banks
Republicans are pushing for reproposal, but a rapid finalisation may prove less far-reaching
Isda pushes to ‘decouple’ Simm calibration from model changes
Emir 3.0 prompts effort to separate risk-weight revisions from methodology updates
Basel war on window-dressing may smooth liquidity, at a price
Changes to G-Sib charge could curb year-end repo volatility, but also cut balance sheet capacity
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Most read
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one
- Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules