Talks were principally focused on the effectiveness of management surrounding credit events that occurred in September and October 2008, involving the US government-sponsored entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers, and Icelandic bank Landsbanki.
In general, participants said the auctions were managed in an orderly fashion, with no major operational disruptions or liquidity problems. Participation rates in auctions exceeded 95%, and those interviewed by the SSG said they were able to identify affected trades on the same day as the credit event occurred, largely because they had actively monitored high-risk names.
Nevertheless, some buy-side firms claimed there was a need for a more equitable auction process - citing flaws in the manner in which deliverable obligations were determined for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac credit events. To help address this, they suggested using independent third-party firms to accept client orders during auctions to eliminate "any information asymmetry between dealers and buy-side firms, as well as to prevent dealers from potentially using its knowledge of positions to skew results".
Dealers dismissed this view, however, insisting auctions were designed to enable them to fulfil their roles as market makers and liquidity providers.
The week on Risk.net, October 6-12, 2017Receive this by email
- SGX, HKEX expect to be among first wave of Mifid II equivalence
- Leaked EU doc could shield legacy swaps from clearing grab
- Quantile, TriOptima face off in cleared swaps compression battle
- ABS set for revival under US Treasury’s liquidity buffer plans
- Quants stymied by lack of alternative risk premia flows data