Breaking the cycle

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is making various changes to the Basel II capital accord in the wake of the financial crisis. But Ryozo Himino argues there should be greater focus on incorporating a built-in stabiliser in the framework

asiarisk-090301-17-gif

Supervisors have for years responded to financial crises by developing new regulations and standards. The US banking crisis in the 1980s resulted in Basel I in 1988, the onset of the Asian financial crisis in 1997 led to the Basel core principles for effective banking supervision and the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management in 1998 was one of the catalysts for the revised Basel market risk framework in 2005.

But each new regulatory amendment stimulates innovations and attempts by financial

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

ESRB narrows its macro-prudential tools

The European Systemic Risk Board is about to announce a slimmed-down list of potential macro-prudential tools, but who has the power to use them is still the subject of debate. By Michael Watt

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here