MARGIN RULES push interdealer inflation swaps to clearing
BLOCKCHAIN promises safeguard for commodity investors
BROKERS face a difficult balancing act
COMMENTARY: The universal solvent
Despite its creator's – or creators' – hopes, Bitcoin has so far failed to set the world on fire, although it has found a use as a convenient way for ransomware writers to collect their loot. But the blockchain technology that underpins it has been seized on by the financial industry as a solution to many problems in identification, record-keeping and settlement.
In the past few months, blockchain has been touted as: the answer to the need for segregated accounts; as a way to deal with the high cost of liquidity at clearing houses; as a solution to the lack of a coherent system for collecting reference data; as a replacement for central securities depositories; as the idea that will make central counterparties unnecessary; and even as the way to make back offices largely obsolete with the introduction of smart contracts.
The latest idea is to use blockchain technology to handle problems of ownership in the physical commodities business. Fraud involving faked proof of ownership is as old as civilisation – blockchain proponents argue a distributed ledger would be open to inspection by all, with any transactions or changes of ownership requiring open consent. They cite in particular the Qingdao warehouse fraud of 2014, when several banks lost hundreds of millions of dollars after the discovery that traders had used the same stocks of copper as collateral on multiple loans. It has also been suggested as the underlying technology for a reliable ledger not just of commodities but of land, diamonds, art and even fine wine.
Sounds good, but there are a couple of important caveats. First, with any form of physical property comes the problem of attachment – it may be possible to create a bulletproof open ledger that records the movement of digital representations of commodities, but the weak link remains the people on the ground – or rather in the warehouse – who must check the billets of aluminium or copper actually exist and are where they ought to be. If the system depends ultimately on the honesty of the warehouse keeper, then it doesn't really solve the problem exposed so dramatically by the Qingdao fraud two years ago.
The second problem is one that has dogged blockchain technologies since their inception: transaction cost. Dreams of using blockchain to track micropayments in a peer-to-peer electricity grid are worthy, but at present, the proof of work involved in each transaction is costly in terms of computing power, and therefore in terms of electrical power, and money. Nor is there much hope of the cost coming down, and the fact that it is costly and difficult to confirm each transaction is central to bitcoin's viability as a reliable distributed ledger technology.
STAT OF THE WEEK
AIG was ordered to pay $230 million to shareholders in MedPartners this month, after a judge criticised the insurer for concealing the existence of an unlimited coverage policy on the troubled medical management company. An earlier suit against MedPartners sought $750 million, but settled for $56 million when the company claimed it was near bankruptcy – neither AIG nor MedPartners mentioned the unlimited coverage, which would have allowed plaintiffs in the earlier suit to get much more in damages.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
"Machine-learning algorithms have become superhuman at tactical game-playing, but do not have the capability yet of true open-ended, long-term strategic planning. The problem is retaining long-term memories: deep-learning computer scientists haven't figured it out yet" – Chi Lee, CIO of institutional investment office Agenda Invest.
ALSO THIS WEEK
IMF's systemic risk findings called into question
Financial connectedness measure "not usually sharply aligned with systemic risk", says Darrell Duffie
Volatility fears obstruct China treasury futures growth
Commercial banks barred despite support for their entry from securities regulator
Basel to allow IRB models for low-default portfolios
Impact studies showing significant capital increase prompted committee rethink
EBA stress test shines light on interest income hedging dilemma
Non-maturing liabilities pose problems for banks' IRRBB hedge accounting
Two-regime approach saves up to 30% op risk capital
Modelling shift to 'crisis mode' mitigates pro-cyclical calculations
Central banks are not fintech accelerators – Bundesbank
German payments authority says fintech should receive equal regulatory treatment to banks
Non-cleared margin rules unsettle Asian booking hubs
European banks reluctant to rely on complicated exemptions for inter-affiliate trades
Interdealer brokers consolidate to survive
Four of top five firms in this year's rankings are involved in deals
CFTC split as it endorses Japanese margin rules
Substituted compliance ruling means parties will not face worst-of-both-worlds regulation
The week on Risk.net, March 10-16 2018Receive this by email